Twitter: GeoffShac
  • The 1997 Masters: My Story
    The 1997 Masters: My Story
    by Tiger Woods
  • The First Major: The Inside Story of the 2016 Ryder Cup
    The First Major: The Inside Story of the 2016 Ryder Cup
    by John Feinstein
  • Tommy's Honor: The Story of Old Tom Morris and Young Tom Morris, Golf's Founding Father and Son
    Tommy's Honor: The Story of Old Tom Morris and Young Tom Morris, Golf's Founding Father and Son
    by Kevin Cook
  • Playing Through: Modern Golf's Most Iconic Players and Moments
    Playing Through: Modern Golf's Most Iconic Players and Moments
    by Jim Moriarty
  • His Ownself: A Semi-Memoir (Anchor Sports)
    His Ownself: A Semi-Memoir (Anchor Sports)
    by Dan Jenkins
  • The Captain Myth: The Ryder Cup and Sport's Great Leadership Delusion
    The Captain Myth: The Ryder Cup and Sport's Great Leadership Delusion
    by Richard Gillis
  • The Ryder Cup: Golf's Grandest Event – A Complete History
    The Ryder Cup: Golf's Grandest Event – A Complete History
    by Martin Davis
  • Harvey Penick: The Life and Wisdom of the Man Who Wrote the Book on Golf
    Harvey Penick: The Life and Wisdom of the Man Who Wrote the Book on Golf
    by Kevin Robbins
  • Grounds for Golf: The History and Fundamentals of Golf Course Design
    Grounds for Golf: The History and Fundamentals of Golf Course Design
    by Geoff Shackelford
  • The Art of Golf Design
    The Art of Golf Design
    by Michael Miller, Geoff Shackelford
  • The Future of Golf: How Golf Lost Its Way and How to Get It Back
    The Future of Golf: How Golf Lost Its Way and How to Get It Back
    by Geoff Shackelford
  • Lines of Charm: Brilliant and Irreverent Quotes, Notes, and Anecdotes from Golf's Golden Age Architects
    Lines of Charm: Brilliant and Irreverent Quotes, Notes, and Anecdotes from Golf's Golden Age Architects
    Sports Media Group
  • Alister MacKenzie's Cypress Point Club
    Alister MacKenzie's Cypress Point Club
    by Geoff Shackelford
  • The Golden Age of Golf Design
    The Golden Age of Golf Design
    by Geoff Shackelford
  • Masters of the Links: Essays on the Art of Golf and Course Design
    Masters of the Links: Essays on the Art of Golf and Course Design
    Sleeping Bear Press
  • The Good Doctor Returns: A Novel
    The Good Doctor Returns: A Novel
    by Geoff Shackelford
  • The Captain: George C. Thomas Jr. and His Golf Architecture
    The Captain: George C. Thomas Jr. and His Golf Architecture
    by Geoff Shackelford
« Lorne On Canadian Open, Coore/Crenshaw | Main | Torrey Tales »
Wednesday
Jan182006

Achenbach On The Ball

After writing about how the modern golf ball is all things wonderful--and no one can argue with its amazing design and construction--Jim Achenbach's gets to the heart of the matter:

Touring pros, aided primarily by technology and greater athletic ability, have become longer because they have learned how to outmaneuver golf ball testing standards. The U.S. Golf Association's Overall Distance Standard now reflects a maximum combined carry and roll distance (under normal test conditions) of 320 yards.
Some players have been known to carry the ball farther than that.
Now, you'd think this notion would outrage the USGA and R&A, right? 
So when is enough enough for the bombers of the PGA Tour? It may be sooner rather than later.
If the USGA rolls back the golf ball – in a drastic alteration to the rules – it should reimburse golf ball manufacturers for the expense of adapting to the new distance standard.

You laugh, but I can't think of a more appropriate headache for all sides in this caper!

The USGA handing out millions of dollars to ballmakers? Absolutely. It is the only fair thing to do.

With a shorter golf ball, golf courses will move the tees up. Golfers can play shorter courses. Older layouts can regain some of the muscle they lost in the era of golf ball expansion.

Well, no one is going to move tees up. But if they stop wanting to move them back, that would be a nice, nice start. 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (4)

No, I don't think that the fact that some players carry it further than 320 yards should outrage the USGA and R&A. If someone swings faster than the machine is set for, they should carry it farther. The speed of 120 MPH is not supposed to be the "maximum" that anyone can swing, but is simply a speed that was chosen for testing. The fact that there are players out there who swing faster than that is irrelevant to the testing process. You can't keep changing the test just because someone swings faster and even if you did, the allowable yardage that the ball could go would have to increase proportionally (or slightly less than that as it did the one time they did change the test.)
01.19.2006 | Unregistered CommenterJohnV
John,
I was being sarcastic. Of course they won't be outraged.

The USGA had developed a test where the player swing speed could be anything, and the ODS would be better protected. That was scrapped in favor of the set clubhead speed test that is now being circumvented hourly on the PGA Tour.

So no, outrage isn't the world. Embarrassed, is more like it.The outrage is the continued refusal to step up and take responsibility.

01.19.2006 | Registered CommenterGeoff
Why can't/won't the same scientists who are employed by the ball companies come up with a ball that won't go as far when struck at the club head speeds which now predominate at the highest levels of the game? $$$. As Nike used to say, chicks dig the long ball, and so do golfers.

Until the non-governing bodies of the game step up, the Bubba Watsons of the new age are going to continue to make golf courses look silly. I know that people like CB McDonald were making these very same protestations of doom many years ago, but it's now becoming reality.
01.19.2006 | Unregistered CommenterMark Smolens
Let's make the insufferable tennis comparison.

When did tennis "jump the shark" or start to die in terms of viewership and popularity? When guys like Phillipousis (spp?) started winning with the cannon-speed serves and no other fundamental game elements. Tennis bacame a boring, for TV at least, sport where the server bombed it, the receiver lunged, and you moved to the next point. Who cares about golf when it's: blast it as far as possible (Hi, Vijay!), then pull out one of your 5 wedges to flip it onto the green. There's no need for players to focus on true shotmaking anymore. Where's Jack and his 1-iron approach that resonates for the ages...or Corey's 3-wood that dared to reach the green in 2? Gone... flog away today....

Cannon-length drives and no other fundamental skills, such as mid-irons, rule the day now in golf. What do we get to watch? The dreaded flogging approach to the game and the resultant disastrous efforts by the TOUR to rein it in with ridiculous course management requirements.

Bubba Watsoon is the future only if the TOUR lets him. Rein in the equipment, and let the courses return to the way they were meant to be (with the occasional waterfall, OF COURSE!).
01.19.2006 | Unregistered CommenterPete the Luddite

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.