Tuesday
Oct192010
"Just seven years ago, 11 Tour events were sponsored by automotive companies, or more than one in three Tour events with a title sponsor."
Adam Schupak on Hyundai looking like the new sponsor at Kapalua, noted this about car companies as PGA Tour sponsors...
If Hyundai finalizes a deal, it would become the third automaker to make the Tour a cornerstone of their marketing efforts, joining foreign-makers Honda and BMW. In its heyday, autos – arguably more than any other industry – supported golf. Just seven years ago, 11 Tour events were sponsored by automotive companies, or more than one in three Tour events with a title sponsor. That figure dropped to six in 2007 before plummeting to just two this season.
Reader Comments (21)
Although Hyundai makes good cars, they are hardly a luxury brand.
http://www.pgatour.com/2009/tournaments/r016/05/07/sbs/index.html
BTW - I drive a Chevrolet Silverado and my wife drives a Honda.
Kapalua is attracting huge numbers of Korean guests.
Hyundai's cars are their most visible US product, but they are a huge and diversified
world company. Seems like a pretty good catch for Kapalua
Excellent point. I hadn't considered it from that point.
Brad
But a larger picture. The real value iof sponsoring a PGA Tour event is NOT the "exposure" a brand gets (naming rights, TV mentions, logos everywhere), but the shmooze factor. The luxury tents and pro-ams companies use to wine and dine and watch golf -- that's the REAL benefit.
"Hey John, I've got spot in the Waste Management tournament pro-am...interested in teeing it up with Phil? Or Rocco Mediate? Great. Can I count on you for renewing our hazardous materials contract for $40 million per? Great."
It's not just car companies. Golf has become so niche AND expensive, there's little appeal for almost ANY company selling directly to consumers. The 2010 schedule includes just a handful of true consumer companies. The rest are all insurance, wealth management, etc.
As a golfer, I can barely watch any of the golf coverage.
Guess the PGA Tour (and TV folks) present a good powerpoint and somehow use smoke and mirrors with the viewership numbers and demographics to sell the many levels of sponsorship (and TV ads).
Maybe the powerpoint begins with the shmooze factor.
You want the young dude stepping out with the hot chick in his Cadilliac CTS-V, not Freddie Couples opening the door and saying he likes Cadillacs.
Old dudes worried about where their money is, or maybe had an unhappy 'ending'
Have seen the poor viewer numbers which are normally reported. Judging by the ads, they are aiming at the above although it has been some time since I noticed a break down of viewers by age.
Guess I have seen a Caddy ad with the young chick and hip music, which might hook the old guys, come to think about it.
With car companies pulling out of sponsorship as noted, they might be convinced golf is the vehicle for them.
With car companies pulling out of sponsorship as noted, they might be convinced golf is NOT the vehicle for them.
I think in the vast majority of cases sponsorship decisions are made at the CEO level. Ken Thompson made it happen for Wachovia. Seth Waugh made it happen at Deutsche. When there was a change at the top at Nestle, Arnie lost them as a sponsor shortly afterwards. The only way to justify a PGA Tour sponsorship is as an "image" componenent as small part of a much larger overall ad campaign.
Just look at McGladrey down at Sea Island. I bet they didn't draw over 10,000 people for the entire week and television viewership had to be abysmal. But the CEO is buddies with Zach and there you go!
Yes , and ror the publicly rade companies stockholders, there goes the dividend, redirected to upper management lsgnappe.
Yes , and for the publicly traded companies stockholders, there goes the dividend, redirected to upper management lagnappe.