Fay: "Of course" This U.S. Open Is A Referendum On Distance Issue
Golf Digest contributing writer David Fay grills former USGA Executive Director David Fay in the June Golf Digest about the 2005 effort to bring the U.S. Open to Merion.After intense questioning from Fay, Fay finally admits what we all know to be the key backstory to next week: the distance issue.
I'm stating the obvious when I bring up weather. Not just the conditions during championship week but the weather leading into the Open. One only has to look back to Bethpage in 2009 and Congressional in 2011 to appreciate that plans can literally be washed away when the squeegees and tons of wood chips become the visual. It's times like that when you yearn for a retractable roof.
"If you look at the historical progression," Davis says, "in 1934 Olin Dutra won the Open at Merion at 13 over. In 1950, Hogan won at seven over. In 1971, Trevino won [forced a playoff] at even par. In 1981, David Graham was seven under. So if the course is soft, I'm thinking 14 under is the winning score this time around. But if it doesn't rain, if Matt gets it firm and fast for four straight days, then I think even par wins it."
I'd go beyond that and say that if Merion plays hard and fast--and the club's maintenance crew gets overzealous--it could stir up memories of the Massacre at Winged Foot in 1974.
Final question: Is this Open a referendum on the distance issue? Of course it is.
Reader Comments (23)
Other than his tendency to steal from Alex Miceli's bow-tie collection, I always liked David Fay. Not as much as Tina Fey.
Maybe this is the USGA's secret mission to bring the 1-iron back?
BS
A club's maintenance crew doesn't do anything during a US Open without every little detail of it being scrutinized by umpteen know-it-alls from the USGA and / or the PGA tour. To lay any blame at the feet the maintenance crews for any of these past disasters is not accurate.
Excellent post. I read that quote several times, wondering how somebody at that level could think that was true.
Have enjoyed D Fay since he began his post-retirement writing career.. he has started to share his own very well thought opiniions.
At the 2011 Bethesda Beltway Open (BBO) 16-under won, and 36 players shot par or better. 31 players actually broke par.
Compare and contrast that with the 2012 US Open where z-e-r-o players shot par or better and +1 was the winning score.
If I remember correctly in the 8 Open's prior the 2011 BBO the total number of players in aggregate who shot par or better was almost exactly the same as the 2011 BBO alone!
It's odd, all sorts of players listed in there that did not play the event. Apologies.
I've been watching this game with passionate devotion for over 50 years, and I could hardly care less what the final score is in relation to mythical par. Par is a relatively new (in relation to the age of golf) construct, designed to make it easier for fans and competitors to see how everyone was doing throughout a tournament. That's fine, I like it, but in the end it matters not one damned whit what the winning score is as measured against par, the only thing that matters is "who got 'round in the least number of strokes?"
Whether that final total is 270, 280, or 290 doesn't matter to me at all. What I love to see is multiple players struggling against conditions and each other, each trying to be the best come Sunday afternoon.
After all, that's all golf really is.