Golf Digest Unveils First-Ever World 100 Greatest
Longtime readers know I have little regard for the Golf Digest panel's sensitivity to timeless design over short term hystrionics. The panel is often caught up in experiential fun over design, much in the way a theater critic might be too enamored with seats, sound, lighting and cocktail options instead of the actual play they've been assigned to analyze.
So it was refreshing to see the panel's first ever world ranking avoiding any cringeworthy selections based on everything but golf architecture (we call this The Alotian Club syndrome). Granted, Turnberry is about 20th on the list of links worth paying to play, not a world top 20, but at least it features several incredible holes, a beautiful setting and loads of history.
While I'm pretty sure Pine Valley is still the No. 1 golf experience, I'm not sure it's the No. 1 design after studying the historic photos featured in the club's amazing new book where George Crump's vision shines through. And Merion at No. 4 is a typical panelist over-hype based on a recent U.S. Open hosting, though it's certainly worthy of tops in the world status. *Seems it was No. 14, not No. 4, which sounds about right. But you can still pretty much guarantee Pinehurst No. 2 will be a top 20 selection the next time the Digest panel votes on their world favorites.
Most heartening was the inclusion of both Barnbougle Dunes courses, where the magnificent Tom Doak-Mike Clayton first course landed at No. 11 on the list.
Here's a slideshow of the top 20.
Reader Comments (27)
(and I've played both)
Whitten & Finch botched their first attempt (to compete head on with GM's Top 100 World). Inclusion of the bogus Asian tracks along with putting the likes of Valderrama, Cabot Links, Fancourt and Kauri Cliffs into the top 50 (and Kawana at 51????) is laughable.
I know they polled their USA panelists a few months ago and added in their foreign affiliates (hello advertising dollars!), but really???
Finally, Ron & Peter did a botched job of editing and presenting and seem to have inserted their two cents (not always accurately either) into the course descriptions. Far from GD's finest hour…..but great commode material.
I don't always agree with you, but on this, you are 1000% right; that's why I am so glad I am going back there this summer!
I have played both PV and RD and they are both wonderful - different, yet wonderful tracks. Let each of them stand on their own merit for what they are. There is no need to "b---h slap" any golf course of PV's caliber in the first place.
@No Longer & Pasaplayer Ditto each of your comments.
BTW, I would cover all action that The DONALD's list of Top 100 would be much shorter! : )
And then there's the content of the list, which as others have noted goes heavy on Asia. Not one but TWO Nine Bridges! FYI in case you're wondering the Korean and Chinese editions of Golf Digest are about 3x-4x thicker than the (ever thinning) US edition. The extra width is not due to more editorial content.
Your rational response is taking all the fun out of this! :)
@Geoff: "The panel is often caught up in experiential fun over design..." Hmmm. Is that a bad thing?
Oak Hill should never be ranked ahead of Oakland Hills.
I love St Georges in Toronto but top 30? Top 100 yes yes but not top 30.
The National in Toronto ahead of Lahich or Bandon?
Sheshan in Shanghai is nice, but its not even top 5 in Asia. It's the Doral of China. The only people who call it the Augusta of China are Chinese people. Like they call Hainan Island the "Hawaii" of Asia. Both are not.
TPC is hard and not minimalist but its I think its underrated in terms of design and influence.
Don't get me started on the Spring City courses in Kunming, beautiful setting but not great golf courses.
That's my rant.
Some may call this unreasonable to point out. I call it inexcusable to include a photo like that.
Shanqing Bay should be included (as it is on Golf Magazine) Along with Mission Hills Lava Fields and or Blackstone... Stone Forest C course And the Dunes at Shenzhou Peninsula could be contenders as well.... Certainly not the 3 listed by Golf Digest. Pathetic!
And WTF is that course in South Korea doing at the 40 mark?
Does anyone have evidence of any other non-U.S. course ranked #1? Old Course ever #1?
What book is that?
Thanks