Annika On Design Career: "Tougher than I thought."
The legendary Annika Sorenstam made some interesting comments about her golf course design career's lack of trajectory to CNN Living's Shane O'Donoghue.Bunkered Golf Magazine links to the interview and paraphrases, but in essence she senses that as a woman clients just assume she'll build "short and easy". Besides the shame of assuming one gender builds short and easy, it's a reminder how many awful developments were built on the premise of championship and tough. If only golf had more "short and easy."
“Being a female, when they throw my name in the ring as a designer candidate a lot of times they say, ‘Oh, well then this course will be short and easy’.
“I don't know where it comes from. I think they just have that predetermined notion of women designing shorter courses, and that's not really what comes to my mind.
“I consider myself, of course a female, but I'm also a golfer and I feel like I can play any golf course out there and I guess maybe my defensive mechanism is, 'Hey, I'd play you anywhere, anytime and then we can go from there’.”
Reader Comments (12)
Now water hazards are built which are simply impossible for some golfers to carry or carry and stay on the green (17th Sawgrass). That's what most developers of Championship Delusions want.
Presumably Annika has more sense than that.
The word ‘Design’ should be removed from many of today’s designs because it’s hard to see any design in many a new course. Gone, its seems are the free thinking flowing ideas that once generated Holes like The Road Hole on TOC or the Redan at North Berwick or even Sea Headrig at Prestwick and many more besides - then why should we be surprised because many a golfer no longer thinks his game so why should we expect modern designers to also have that capacity to think Golf course design.
We reap what we sow - never a truer word spoken.
You clearly need to see more of what's being built in this decade (and the last .... )
May I draw your attention to what I said
"The word ‘Design’ should be removed from many of today’s designs because it’s hard to see any design in many a new course." noting I used the word MANY not ALL .
I have seen some of the new designs and wonder just what was destroyed in their making - we still to this day seem to be unable to work with nature, it seems we have to destroy or remove much of it before we rebuild to course in the image of some designers mind which has more to do with assisting golfers scores than producing sporty courses.
Ian - the design industry is still struggling in understanding its own history. It certainly does not seem to understand what when on pre 1899, yet many of the so called Golden Age designers copied many designs from the 19th Century.
I try to base my comment on facts and research, I do so to try to assist and inform as I believe that acquired knowledge assist all. My comments are not always accepted, but then who's done the research.
Thanks for posting. You may wish to talk to people who actually work in the field of GCA to round out your knowledge.
Another good reference I found was a blog written by a Canadian named Ian Andrew.
Perhaps you will have the qualifications to post on here in the near future...
And yes, I say the same about Jack, Arnold etc
Have C&C become Crenshaw design, and the courses will look like his scores the last few years on the Champions Tour.
Cheers