"Why do Florida House Republicans keep driving money into the World Golf Hall of Fame?"
That's the question Jeremy Wallace asks for the Tampa Bay Times when looking into Florida House efforts to root out corporate welfare.
He writes:
Tucked on page 65 of a 187-page bill is a clause that continues to award $2 million in annual tax credits to the World Golf Hall of Fame in St. Augustine for the next six years. Even in their analysis to members, House Republicans called the museum the single worst bet the state is making with tax credits.
Wallace calls the WGHOF a "curious outlier" even though the bill's author is Rep. Paul Renner, whose district includes the museum.
When asked why the tax credit was left alone, Renner replied: "I don't know."
In a subsequent interview with the Times/Herald, Renner said the House did not want to disrupt existing deals with museums.
Reader Comments (33)
sarcastically yours,
dig
Logic and facts don't matter to those that think everyone else's money belongs to them
@edward
lets add up how much white makes pay in taxes versus any other group. Better yet, let's compare that to every other group combined
Davenport: I don't know sir.
I actually read this as Geoff presenting a point from the conservative viewpoint.
"Why is the government picking and choosing winners and losers, rather allowing the fremarket being allowed to work?"
"Why have some entranced legislatures continued the old insider ways,; rather than waking, up getting rid of items from the budget that are against the true principals of those who voted in the Republican legislatures?"
Now who may see some ulterior joy coming to Geoff in the irony of this matter. But the end questions of do these tax breaks present a government action against the principals of the majority party in the State of Florida, are still just as real.
Now I know we can all can find all sorts of irony on all sides of political parties. But this is a very good golf question.
With all of the TV revenues received by the PGA Tour, USGA, PGA, & R&A, and the other many endorsement and promotional dollars that flows through golf, is the WGOF a worthy and justified recipient of tax credits?
This end, ultimate question needs to be answered, no matter the political slant.
All politics is local.
I am not sure we will ever know because it is run by the World Golf Foundation.
The story is misleading as it seems that the start of Florida is giving money to the World Golf Hall of Fame. Is it really?
So to recap, I'm not a hypocrite, but you are a moron.
Try harder next time, cuck!
Also Revenue including contributions/fundraising were quite large.
$41 million 2011
$72 million 2012
(2012 looks like an outlier year based on other long term historical info on the return)
Payroll was $8.8 million and very lopsided to,officers and highly compensated.
Looking at this I wonder how much of a donation to The First Tee is paying to keep the WGHofF operating.
Yes, it's an OK afternoon visit but if I had three days for a golf-centric Florida vacation, I could think of 25 other places I'd go to first. Including Sawgrass, which inadvertently probably hurts them more than helps, with the exception of PLAYERS and induction weeks.
Nobody (and really, I mean nobody in the universe) cares if you are a republican or a democrat or a ring-tailed lemur who wants to bring back the Free Soil Party. But you do like to call people around here "cucks", which has the consequence of painting you as an inelqouent asshole. Take a second to realize that you spent some of your time today using an assumed moniker to call people you don't know silly, uncreative names on an Internet forum about golf.
-I answered the question
-you obviously care enough about all of it to post your long-winded answer. Funny how you know so much about my commenting habits yet I've never recognized your name. Do you have a crush on me?
-other than getting it completely wrong, your comment is spot on
-cuck
I've replied to you several times over the last year, and post here somewhat regularly (and have under several names since 2007). Not recognizing my name says more about you, I would offer.
And my reply this time was simply that I think you do yourself a disservice by using the word "cuck". It exposes you.
Consider it a pro tip. Also, sorry that my previous post was so long-winded. Three sentences is a lot of reading, I know.
Carry on.
I'm more interested in exposing you as a bitter, anger-filled cuck
What not recognizing your name says about me, is that I never noticed the unimportant, irrelevant comments coming from a basic boring cuck
http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/reviewedcom/2017/03/22/beats-by-dre-can-play-the-soundtrack-to-your-fitness-goals-with-todays-deals/99499884/