Twitter: GeoffShac
  • The 1997 Masters: My Story
    The 1997 Masters: My Story
    by Tiger Woods
  • The First Major: The Inside Story of the 2016 Ryder Cup
    The First Major: The Inside Story of the 2016 Ryder Cup
    by John Feinstein
  • Tommy's Honor: The Story of Old Tom Morris and Young Tom Morris, Golf's Founding Father and Son
    Tommy's Honor: The Story of Old Tom Morris and Young Tom Morris, Golf's Founding Father and Son
    by Kevin Cook
  • Playing Through: Modern Golf's Most Iconic Players and Moments
    Playing Through: Modern Golf's Most Iconic Players and Moments
    by Jim Moriarty
  • His Ownself: A Semi-Memoir (Anchor Sports)
    His Ownself: A Semi-Memoir (Anchor Sports)
    by Dan Jenkins
  • The Captain Myth: The Ryder Cup and Sport's Great Leadership Delusion
    The Captain Myth: The Ryder Cup and Sport's Great Leadership Delusion
    by Richard Gillis
  • The Ryder Cup: Golf's Grandest Event – A Complete History
    The Ryder Cup: Golf's Grandest Event – A Complete History
    by Martin Davis
  • Harvey Penick: The Life and Wisdom of the Man Who Wrote the Book on Golf
    Harvey Penick: The Life and Wisdom of the Man Who Wrote the Book on Golf
    by Kevin Robbins
  • Grounds for Golf: The History and Fundamentals of Golf Course Design
    Grounds for Golf: The History and Fundamentals of Golf Course Design
    by Geoff Shackelford
  • The Art of Golf Design
    The Art of Golf Design
    by Michael Miller, Geoff Shackelford
  • The Future of Golf: How Golf Lost Its Way and How to Get It Back
    The Future of Golf: How Golf Lost Its Way and How to Get It Back
    by Geoff Shackelford
  • Lines of Charm: Brilliant and Irreverent Quotes, Notes, and Anecdotes from Golf's Golden Age Architects
    Lines of Charm: Brilliant and Irreverent Quotes, Notes, and Anecdotes from Golf's Golden Age Architects
    Sports Media Group
  • Alister MacKenzie's Cypress Point Club
    Alister MacKenzie's Cypress Point Club
    by Geoff Shackelford
  • The Golden Age of Golf Design
    The Golden Age of Golf Design
    by Geoff Shackelford
  • Masters of the Links: Essays on the Art of Golf and Course Design
    Masters of the Links: Essays on the Art of Golf and Course Design
    Sleeping Bear Press
  • The Good Doctor Returns: A Novel
    The Good Doctor Returns: A Novel
    by Geoff Shackelford
  • The Captain: George C. Thomas Jr. and His Golf Architecture
    The Captain: George C. Thomas Jr. and His Golf Architecture
    by Geoff Shackelford
« Two Masters Round 1 Game Stories | Main | Rubenstein On Augusta's 3rd »
Thursday
Apr062006

Frank Thomas: 10 Clubs and More Rough

I'm not sure what's more disappointing: that former USGA technical director is advocating more rough and 10 clubs, or that the New York Times continues to print his pieces, even putting the latest column on the main Op-Ed page. 

In an email sent out to his subscribers, the headline read "THOMAS PROPOSES TEN CLUB SOLUTION FOR TOUR," and the subheader said, "Limiting club selection and focus on course set up can help allay technology fears."

In "Golf's Power Failure," Thomas writes:

Now officers and elders of the golf association — which, along with the Royal and Ancient Golf Association of St. Andrews, Scotland, writes the game's rules — have asked manufacturers to study the feasibility of a ball that would travel on average 25 yards less than those used now.

This idea is wrongheaded in several ways. To begin with, mandating such a ball would affect all players, and the vast majority of golfers don't hit the ball too far. (Nor do we hit the ball nearly as far as we think we do; well-supported data indicates that the average golfer hits a driver 192 yards — while thinking that he hits it approximately 230.) It's safe to say that for most of us the great layouts created a century ago still provide plenty of challenge.

Which is why Thomas is advocating change, but not before questioning recent action taken by the USGA to mop up for many of the things that got by his watch:

Even before addressing the ball, the rule-making bodies took several foolish steps. They instituted limits that allowed some spring-like effect from the club faces of high-tech titanium drivers (a phenomenon that let the club itself enhance the ball speed at impact for the first time), while restricting both the length of a driver (which will affect few players) and the permissible height of a tee (which is downright silly). They have also explored limits on how much a club can resist twisting at impact; such a change, like the reduced-distance ball, would have a much greater effect on the average golfer than on those who play for prize money.

Ah, so since this debate has always been part of the game and we should relax a bit, Thomas suggests doing something about it:

The goal should be to keep professionals from mindlessly bombing away while not unnecessarily hurting the average player. I have two suggestions. First, tournament courses should be set up to punish long but wayward hitters by narrowing fairways and growing higher rough (the longer grass along the margins of the hole).

Yes, it's worked so well and cures many sleep disorders. And really, when you consider that fairways are now 20-25 yars, they have so much room to get narrower. I saw the width of a ball would be fair.

The other major change would address the imbalance that today seems to favor power so strongly over touch and finesse. To place greater emphasis on the old skills required to work the ball and to hit less-than-full shots, professional players should be restricted to 10 clubs in their bags instead of the current 14.

What do you think manufacturers would hate more, a ball rollback that doesn't impact anyone under 110 mph, or Tour pros only uh, "branding" 10 clubs instead of 14?

And they say I'm anti-technology!

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (3)

Take away the spring and you narrow the gap between high club head speeds and the rest of the golfing public. Why can't they address the real problem?

Was the USGA aware that the spring was only going to favor fast club head speeds, therefore making a rule that was only going to favor professionals, which make up about 1% of the golfing public? And now after scratching their heads for the past 5 years they still haven't figured out whats happened. The USGA needs a spokesperson, because its obvious that one talking head doesn't know what the other talking heads have already said. Here's an example.

Callaway was incensed when the USGA passed judgment on his club, questioning whether it's of any benefit to the average golfer. That's what Walter Driver, the USGA's chairman of the Implements and Ball Committee, did in an article in the Feb. 21 edition of the Chicago Sun-Times, saying "the average player gets very little benefit from clubs with nonconforming [spring-like effects] .... They simply can't swing fast enough."

Ok, so the USGA has allowed this slingshot to propel rocks for the 120mph plus golfer, while they know damn good and well that its only benefiting say the......aaaahhhhhh......oh yeah, the 120mph swings. Geoff, seriously, I'm trying not to laugh, now they want to pull the limit down to 10 clubs in the bag, can we get some testing done in Far Hills? Drug testing that is.

Ok, we know the average joe doesn't swing the club fast enough to gain that huge spring like effect, nor does 2/3rd's of the membership on Tour, so now the USGA is going to even things out by droping the club count to 10?

Why, Joe Average can't recognize this game today compared to the year 2000, and most of the average Joes have turned to something else more fun to occupy their time than watching bashers hitting 350 yard bombs through the air into the thatch, then somehow manhandling it out onto the green from 85 yards away, and two putting for birdie. Most Joe's have checked out; reduce the club count to 10 in the bag, and I'll start the "10 count" on the lingerers. Two wrongs will never make it right. The only right answer, is to make the right decision. Get rid of the spring!
04.7.2006 | Unregistered CommenterSean Murphy
What amatuer flys it 330? Pros should have their own rules. Why do amaturers care, when they are only 1% of the golfing population. As an amatuer, I'd much rather see 10 to 15 guys in the thick of it come late Sunday afternoon vs. watching Tiger beat Vijay by three and the rest of the field isn't even being mentioned on the back nine. Watching golf today is boring when theres only 2 or 3 guys with a real chance.

Geoff, one of the best Masters finishes I've ever watched was the Masters of 1989. On that Sunday afternoon there were 10 maybe 12 guys heading into the back nine within 3 shots of one another. No one that day knew who would win the tournament. That's when golf was fun to watch.
04.7.2006 | Unregistered CommenterCarl
Carl
It's because manufacturers think people really dig the long ball. LoL's. They think that's what makes a guy like you want to watch golf. In 1989 there was still parity in the golf ball, and golf back then was still golf. Back then, so called bombers of the golf ball couldn't putt, they couldn't hit a 6 iron or 7 iron close enough to putt well. The bombers today are left with 9 irons and wedges, and so their putting has improved. Isn't that fun to watch?
04.7.2006 | Unregistered CommenterJ.P.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.