The Elite 8: 2016 Olympic Course Design "Finalists"
The jury panel charged with narrowing the initial bids for the Rio 2016 Olympic golf course design commission whittled the "contest" to eight finalists, and all of the surviving candidates are believed to have been notified of their status.
The finalists will be in Rio de Janeiro in the next two weeks for project briefing workshops, with 3-4 weeks to prepare presentations followed by interviews and a decision expected by mid-to-late January.
Here they are, as confirmed by sources, in alphabetical order:
Tom Doak
Gil Hanse
Martin Hawtree
Robert Trent Jones II
Jack Nicklaus/Annika Sorenstam
Greg Norman/Lorena Ochoa
Gary Player
Peter Thomson/Michael Ross Perrett

**The Rio 2016 website now has an official press release posted:
On Friday, December 2nd, the eight finalists of the Golf Course Architectural Services RFP were announced. The winning participants will design the executive project for the Olympic venue, to be built in Rio de Janeiro to welcome golf’s return to the Olympic Games program in 2016, after 112 years of absence.
These are the contest finalists in alphabetical order: Gary Player Design, Greg Norman Golf Course Design, Hanse Golf Design, Hawtree Ltd., Nicklaus Design, Renaissance Golf, Robert Trent Jones II and Thomson-Perret Golf Course Architects.
The awarded company name will be disclosed early in 2012, on a date to be announced by Rio 2016™.
Reader Comments (36)
No Maclay Kidd on there?
-LK
Hawtree is a sleeper, amazing that the Trump course has given him that much PR?
Was that cut and paste from a media release? It is "Ross Perrett" not Michael. Michael Wolveridge was their former partner when it was TWP way back when I was a college intern there!
No, that was my crack reporting channeling the name of Thomson's former partner...corrected!
Gary Player Design has designed over 200 world class courses over the years.
look at their website:
www.garyplayer.com
They are a viable candidate for the final design.
Rees, Faldo, DMK, Fazio, Hurzden & Fry, Palmer, others?
I'm not sure why it is "interesting" why those you mentioned were left out? Excluding Doak and Hanse, how do the 6 you list differ from the 6 included?
I think you are smellin' what's on the fire. :) I'm with your picks - either that or Player.
-LK
Did Faldo enter for consideration? Or Crenshaw and his partner? They are among the best-regarded player-"designers," though all the male players or former players have some decent credentials (like LK I am not too conversant in Annika's history in this field, and speaking for myself I know nothing of Ochoa's history. I assumed their submission partners had opted to include a crack woman golfer so that the course, which will be contested by both sexes in the Olympics, will be adaptable enough to reflet the competitive level in both types of game -- a shrewd strategy in some ways).
Fazio missing seems unreal? It's possible he went the C&C method and opted out. The small fee was probably his motivation.
The Gary Payer courses I have played tend to be a disappointment compared to the anticipation.
The Player course at Sun City is tough because of length and kikuyu, but it is on the boring side, mainly because of a lot of vanilla holes and uninspiring terrain.
Fancourt (Links course) is a major letdown compared to the cost and the hype. There might have been commercial reasons for playing the Presidents Cup there (BTW, the course will be on TV in January - the European Volvo Champions is being played there this year).
I like Leopard Creek - the highlight is the wildlife. It also fit my eye. But the design didn't blow me away.
Outside of South Africa, Saadiyat Beach in Abu Dhabi was a bit of a let down considering its impressive seaside location.
Finally, I can never really recall any South African course other than Durban CC being in the global top 100 in either Golf Digest or Golf Magazine (provide a link if I am missing something - also, GD used to publish something like the top 100 outside of America, which I never found to be well researched - maybe that is what you are referring to).
Bottom line though is that Player courses could be a whole lot better than they turn out to be.
If Fazio did submit and wasn't short listed I don't find that interesting or unreal at all. Do we even know who the selection committee is? Do we even know what they were looking for? Did any of the committee visit some of the courses of each architect? If they didn't visit the courses then all it came down to was marketing material, their awards and how they answered the questions which means ZERO in reality. The list who made it and the list who missed out would have all had very similar "fluff" brochures put together all saying exactly the same thing (i.e: we create championship courses, we respect the land, spend hours on routing and on site etc etc) and all will have beautiful photos. My guess is like most RFP's the people making the selection really are clueless. They went the easy way with 4 of the biggest names ever in professional golf and then the four architects that have been in the media the most in recent years.
Jack, he could be thinking about possible dividends for the kids after he's not involved so much anymore. Hanse, could kick him up into the top-tier from a perception perspecitve (i.e., with those that don't know any better). Norman, trophy collector. Player, another horn for him to toot. Etc...
Personally I'd run the other way. This Brazil Olympics has the potential to be one of the great debacles of all time... (IMO)
The golf course may just be unbuildable, late, over budget and unusable.
Still don't know who are the members of the jury?
I have always been a Player fan and don't think he gets his due as a player or a designer. My point was that when you win the Grand Slam, 9 Majors and design 300+ golf courses you deserve to be on the short list.
From what I understand about his design philosophy he concentrates on making his courses playable for all golfers, not just the low handicappers or pros, because the majority can't break 90 (found this on his web site http://garyplayer.com/golf-course-design/about/). If I am accurate then this should actually help him with Rio because the course has to be useful after the Olympics. It seems like when a city hosts the Olympics it is left with a lot of unusable venues which ends up being detrimental years down the road. Shouldn't the committee consider what happens after the games leave? I'd like to hear what you and others think.
In the end anyone on this list will design a course worthy of hosting the games. If that is the case then what else needs to be considered?
GS - Why do you think RTJ 3 and Norman/Ochoa are the favorites?