Leaving London 2012
After a quick vacation I took in the festivities in London 2012 and had a fantastic time. Despite the various boondoggles and controversies--of which there are many currently festering--the city is functioning well and the one event I was able to get into--beach volleyball--was absolutely fantastic, with an energetic crowd, stunning (temporary) venue and close matches.
Before boarding, a few quick thoughts:
- Golf is going to have to step it up to compete with the other sports for attention. Sadly, the current 72-hole stroke play format ensures it will get little attention and after watching the sensitive dynamics between teammates in beach volleyball and in other sports, we are completely blowing the Olympic opportunity by not showing the world that there is no more fascinating, intelligent, emotional, dramatic and beautifully awkward sport than golf when played with a teammate under Olympic pressure. So Tiger, since you helped influence this format, could you help influence its undoing now? Please?
- The empty seat fiasco, laid out beautifully by James Lawton in the Independent today, is as bad as you'd suspect. Tickets were difficult to get and for everyone here who tried and failed, or for visitors like me, it's insulting to see so many empty seats when you'd be willing to hand over good money to see an event. I'm less annoyed by the extensive dignitary seats going unfilled than I am by the large blocks in normal seating that went unsold. Most galling was turning on the BBC to see Caroline Wozniacki play at Wimbledon on a beautiful Saturday evening against a Great British athlete in front of maybe 1/3 the capacity of centre court, a session I tried to buy tickets for multiple times. Imagine how the residents who struck out must have felt.
-I will miss the papers terribly. The Guardian, Telegraph, Times, Independent and the tabloids are pulling out all the stops and while the coverage online is super and a must for your Olympic reading enjoyment, there is nothing like starting the day with a beautifully designed newspaper full of great writing and photography.
-The BBC here is remarkable. The coverage is extensive, easy to find and lacking many of the pomp that Americans seem to love and sports fans get annoyed with. But the jingoistic homerism really undoes their credibility, with the low point coming Sunday night by showing announcer reaction to a third place performance in women's swimming. NBC may be pro-American, but I don't think we'll ever see a replay of Dan Hicks and Rowdy Gaines rooting on someone to win a medal!
Cheers!
Reader Comments (17)
But in the UK they have very few medal expectations, and those that there are are hopelessly over-hyped and pressurised - hence the nonsensical commentaries such as the one on the road cycling on Saturday, in which the British team, which was expected to do well even by independent opinion, apparently took a wrong turning and finished up in Newcastle, leaving the commentators (who were absolutely dreadful irrespective of nationality) at a loss as to who else was actually participating in the race!
And you mention only the nationals - there is a more than thriving non-London-centric press perhaps best epitomised by The Herald and the Hootsmon (Scotsman) in Scotland, but matched elsewhere throughout the country.
Geoff, your coverage of the golf (and sports) scene in your visit to Britain has been terrific and I'd like to both congratulate you on it and thank you for it.
Great job!
('Olympic legend' is a -- perhaps -- somewhat debased concept in the British Isles, admittedly, with the exception recently of Sir Steven Redgrave, and a few others; see, for instance, the antics of Eddie 'The Eagle' Edwards in the Winter Olympics, even money to combust on pretty much any ski jump he attempted.)
Moreover, poor Rebecca was mercilessly slated in the UK tabloids and by some of the 'edgier' comedians (very brave, lads), for her looks; so while the broadsheet and redtop press in the UK is, as you've noted, Geoff, vibrant, it can also be unforgivable cruel. And thus, for her to win under those pressures, from a terrible lane, in a home Games where GB was, shall we say, not thriving, well, it was worth much of the praise!
Sadly, very sadly, NFL training camp trumps the Olympics.
I also watched a few minutes of cycling, and the cars/motorcycles within feet of the bikers made me too nervous to continue. And it was on wet pavement to add to the danger.
Also, that wasn't an event Adlington was supposed to medal in at all. She even admits the 400 is a side event for her these days, so bronze is a good return. Wait for her 800m later this week.
I hear, though, that they'll be partnering up for the next games.
I love your blog Geoff but this statment is nauseating. you seem to think the the olympics have he appeal of some sort of Ryder/Presidents Cup squared. I think that those formats rely on twelve players per side, with no one going home--everybody plays at the end. The Olympics will be just line the Omega World Cup, where most of these odd ball formats have been tried with two guys.
Part of the team concept is getting guys who want to play together. Did you watch Tiger with Phil at Oakland Hills? you got the awkward part right about that one.
I know you really want this--but your match play/mixed team/losers bracket plays a scramble to get back into the medal bracket format is too clever by half. Match play, unless you get really lucky and get names in the final, will KILL golf in the olympics, not get people to watch it.
If you want to grow golf and generate buzz in the olympics, you need to think of ways to get more names in at the end--because all the IOC will care bout during the review after 2020 will be the ratings--i.e. did NON golfers tune in to watch.
Plus we'd failed to win any medals on day 1 when the cycling was suposed to be a case of who's going to be second....
John
Otherwise, as I think the whole idea is preposterous, it barely matters.