2016 PGA Round Two This And That: Lively Friday At Baltusrol
There was a bit of something for everyone Friday at Baltusrol: great golf from Jimmy Walker and Robert Streb (the 30th 63 in a major, writes Brian Wacker), a rules issue with Jordan Spieth that generated much discussion, an epic course setup gaffe, and no shortage of volatile play from other top names.
Adam Schupak on the leaders Walker and Streb.
Best of all, we have what appears to be the makings of a grand finish with most of the game's best in the battle, assuming the Sunday weather will cooperate.
Henrik Stenson is on fire, as he has been at other times in his career, Brian Wacker notes.
After a 65 in the worst conditions Friday, Patrick Reed has positioned himself nicely in a major, for a change, reports Joel Beall.
Alan Shipnuck goes a step further and says this is a potential breakthrough weekend for Reed.
Ryan Herrington talks exclusively with Colt Knost about the wrong hole location and shares the PGA of America's explanation.
“I called an official over and said, ‘What’s going on here?’” Knost detailed after his round. “And he said, ‘We messed up.’"
According to a release from the PGA of America, the Rules Committee realized the error after the players hit their second shots. Shortly after, officials handed out revised hole-location sheets to the group, and to all subsequent groups.
Knost took to Twitter after the round.
Dave Kindred on Jordan Spieth having a chance to salvage the season, especially with this being his last start of significance unless you consider the playoffs important.
Kevin Casey at Golfweek.com with all of the particulars on Spieth's ruling and possible violation that was determined not to be a violation.Golfweek's Jeff Babineau says there was no rules issue. Nothing to see here, so move along. I think that was a little strong given what appeared to be a violation, but Babineau's explanation also does make sense given where we are with rulings.
Once his ball was back on the path free of the casual water, Spieth took his stance, addressed the ball as if he were to play it, and got the thumbs up to play on from Gregory – ahem, the expert rules official.
That’s all Spieth needed, though surely Mitch from Montauk and Sal from Summit soon were lighting up the phone lines once they saw one of Spieth’s spiffy Under Armour golf shoes hovering over a puddle.
Spieth assessed his situation, facing 190 yards with some trees in front to negotiate, then elected to play in a slightly different direction than he originally planned – something he totally was within the rules to do. In fact, playing in a different direction is allowed under Rules of Golf Decision 20-2c/0.8.
The 7th hole turned things around for Jason Day, writes Rex Hoggard at GolfChannel.com.
Justin Tasch of the New York Daily News on Phil Mickelson’s triple bogey start plus other notes from a weird day that saw pre tournament favorite Dustin Johnson heading home early.
“I think in the history of the PGA Championship, that’s the worst start of any player’s round,” Mickelson said. “I don’t even know what to say. It was just a pure mental block.”
Alex Myers with the evidence of Phil's rough start, which was salvaged by several birdies and a made cut for the Baltusrol defending champion.
Rory McIlroy missed the cut and now, because he backed out of the Olympics has a lot of time off to rethink his putting issues, reports James Corrigan.
Once again it was McIlroy’s putter to blame, although, bizarrely, it was the same implement which appeared to have dug him out of the hole on the 17th. There were three missed five footers and for the second day running – and, yes, for the umpteenth time this season - it was the shortest club in the bag which was letting down all the others.
Brently Romine with the Ryder Cup ramifications of the current leaderboard.
Round one ratings on TNT were down 30% from last year.
Note to those missing the cut: Zika virus has come to Florida. Hope those guys skipping the Olympics over the virus are not spending much time in Florida for a while!
Reader Comments (20)
Head case.
Wasn't ever going to happen. Way too big a mountain.
A much more realistic goal for Rory would be the non-American with the most majors. Player has that at 9.
But that won't happen either.
On top of all of this, he responds to any kind of criticism very poorly, gets very defensive and doesn't have the proper makeup to deal with the pressures that come with being number one, or one of the top 5 in the world. I'm sure he has already calculated that he has enough money to walk away from all this - and it's crossed his mind. Time will tell.
When I watch Michelle Wie hobbling around like some kind of hurt puppy dog, seemingly begging for sympathy, and Rors missing cuts and making poor showings, I wonder if Nike is ever going to re-evaluate their approach and put more emphasis on performance in the remuneration schemes.
He may still be the 250 pounder sitting on the couch of his front porch in his underwear, as I have predicted for 4 years now. I hope I'm wrong- I said he'd be 33 when this happens.
I'm speaking as a guy who has been fat, almost skinny, then pleasantly chubby, back to normal, and then some. Each time I had to make what felt like big adjustments in order to get the club in a little better position. Feels like I had to go a mile but in reality it was a few inches.
But what Chico said, he's definitely not enjoying the game. Body language and his petulant behavior speaks volumes. Being in Nike's pocket is also not helping matters.
Curious if you could explain why being in NIKE's pocket doesn't help things? Responsibilities? Commitments? Faulty equipment? Elaborate if you can.
Jimbo
RM reminds me a little of Couples - oodles of natural talent but really doesn't like to put in the drudgery around the green and probably found out no. 1 has more scrutiny than he realized. He is so talented I can see him winning 2 more majors without becoming a grinder but even that is in question if the game is no fun. Nike is to golf what SI covers are to sports- a reward and a jinks. As for his takeaway- I use a Martin Hall drill he posted on utube with a tennis ball behind the golf ball because I tend to take the club too inside. It cured me in 10 minutes. I wrote Martin and thanked him. I hope RM gets back in the game; golf is more fun to watch when he is on form.
I see Rory's putting woes as a symptom more so than the root cause of his frustrations. One thing you cannot say about Day, Spieth, or DJ is that they're not hungry. They're out there grinding away, regardless of whether they're shooting 65 or 75. Maybe at some point that will change for them, but when it does - they probably won't expect to be in contention every week they tee it up.
I'm still waiting for Rory to sell-out completely to see how great he can be. I don't look back on how remarkable he played in 2014 and think that was an anomaly, I think he has that level within him on a much more consistent basis than he's shown.
I don't pretend to know his work ethic... I don't think he's lazy. But sometimes he seems consumed with indifference. His frustration now seems to be providing some means of motivation, but whether it's motivation to win to get the writers off his back or because he truly wants to be in the same conversation with those guys mentioned above - it's hard to tell some days.
He said he doesn't play golf for fun anymore. That might be a good place to start.
They move in fast and hard, yank the top stars from established equipment/clothing brands by throwing huge $$ at athletes and their agents. Slap a swoosh on an "new and improved" yet cheaper quality outsourced product while marketing it as cutting edge. Then they throw out huge marketing campaigns and promotional material with lots of bright and shiny colors but little substance.
Factor in the huge $$ they pay their top endorsers along with the inevitable commitments doing promotions plus advertisements and it's not hard to see that athletes start to feel more like pawns that are put upon a pedestal.
Do they make decent golf stuff? Yes IMO. Their socks and shorts are great! Is it top notch relative to Nike's considerable financial and technological wherewithal? Heck no. Are there better performing brands? You bet!!!