And Then Mike Davis Told Jack: "We're Going To Get There" On Ball Rollback
With the Honda Classic in town and a role in the tournament, Jack Nicklaus talked to media about a variety of topics, including distance. Over dinner Sunday night, USGA CEO Mike Davis suggested a solution along the lines of what Nicklaus has long proposed is now on the table. Golfweek's Dan Kilbridge reports:
“Mike said, ‘We’re getting there. We’re going to get there. I need your help when we get there.'” Nicklaus said. “I said, ‘That’s fine. I’m happy to help you. I’ve only been yelling at you for 40 years.’ 1977 is the first time I went to the USGA.”
Nicklaus said sarcastically he assumed that meant the USGA would be studying the issue for ‘another 10 years or so.’
“(Davis) says, ‘Oh, no, no, no. We’re not going to do that. I think we’re getting closer to agreements with the R&A and be able to do some things and be able to help.’ Because the R&A has been – sort of doesn’t want to do anything. I’m hoping that’s going to happen. I’ve talked to Mike a lot. Mike’s been very optimistic about wanting to get something done but hasn’t been able to get there yet.”
Oh joy, here we go! This is going to get very interesting very fast.





Reader Comments (36)
Jack...you won all of your tournaments with a non-competition ball....could you have won with the same tournaments with the same restricted ball, pro's use these days...lol.
This is definitely going to be a case of the cure is worse than the disease.
"They never got there"
He blamed the ball. Huh?
Makes a degree of sense, really, when you think about them as overlapping issues.
Longer courses to walk, tricked-up holes to protect scores from getting out of hand, waiting on par-5s ... because the ball goes too far.
Interesting.
The best players will always win regardless of the equipment. So, yes, Jack would have still dominated his era. Just like Tiger would have still dominated his era.
Jack was/is one of the few who can see the forest for the trees.
all the R&A’s fault!
Nicklaus used maybe the worst balls of his era to win his 18 majors. If you believe the anecdotes about MacGregor balls, it was in effect a competition ball!
Mike Davis is as spineless as they come.
Regardless, the USGA is the problem, so slow to decisions and terrible ones at that (look at the handicap revision - joke) which is typical to poorly run organizations.
When is everyone going to say enough and turn the tide on USGA and get an efficient and productive leadership or organization in place?
http://golfweek.com/2009/11/25/looking-back-macgregors-golf-balls/
Jack's ultimatum for a longer ball is interesting.
Gee wis guys/gals....my humor must have missed my intention...I know Jack would still have been as great...but we all know some "golf journalist" will ask that question...like a hundred times...if they change the ball.
We all know the best players are going to win...so why change anything!!
Even better, make the ball light enough to float. A boon for hackers.
Matt
In 1931 the USGA changed the weight of the ball from 1.62 oz to 1.55. The pros called it the floater. They hated it and the USGA relented in 1932 and went back to 1.62 ounces.
Maybe they should try 1.60 or 1.58 - that might work.
Whatever they do to change the ball, Dusting Johnson will still be longer than Jack Nicklaus in his prime. As he should be.
Okay, you're Jack Nicklaus and in charge of running his company. Would you have done what you suggested he should have done?
The R&A always seemed more lax on equipment. They allowed a smaller (longer ball), didn't care much for COR limits, etc. So maybe the USGA has been pushing on things but didn't want to split with the R&A like they did on the ball decades ago.
Yeah that will speed things up.
The idea is that ... most guys would end up dialing back, to keep their ball on the planet. :) Except for a few that can guide the clubface while swinging out of their shoes. :)
I wouldn't run my business into the ground to do that.
If I were Jack, I would take my pulpit, complain about the ball thats that continually beat my company in market share,
complain about clubs that beat my club company regularly,
and try to change the game from the courses I polluted the world with, so my company can get redesign jobs to bring them back in to line with the equipment I helped get reduced!!
The good news is these changes could take effect immediately if course owners, or the board of directors in the case of private clubs, decide they want to eliminate slow play.
If your club has a slow play problem, take a look in the mirror, don't blame others.
Here's the entirety of the pace-of-play policy at an excellent daily fee course in Southern California:
"Terms and Conditions: You are required to play in under 4 hours and 15 minutes if you are teeing off before 8 a.m.. If you cannot maintain a reasonable pace you will be asked to skip holes until you are in position. Early times are a privilege and must be treated as such."
That's it. Thoughts?