Ferguson: "Crowd atmosphere can't be overlooked as key factor at majors"
AP's Doug Ferguson does a nice job pointing out the atmospheric differences between Erin Hills and TPC River Highlands, something fans noticed. He agrees with our assessment that getting fans closer to the action makes a difference and should be a vital element to course setup.
He writes:
A big atmosphere comes from energized, enthusiastic fans. And those fans get their energy from being close to the action, feeding off the noise around them. That starts with being able to see golf without having to squint their eyes.
The lack of major atmosphere was evident at Erin Hills.
It was even worse at Chambers Bay, the public course built out of a sand and gravel pit next to the Puget Sound. On one hole, fans were perched high on a ridge and looked like a row of figurines from down below. The par-5 eighth hole at Chambers Bay didn't have any fans at all.
That's the biggest risk the USGA is taking by going to big, new courses.
The U.S. Open returns to traditional courses with a smaller blueprint over the next decade. Even after a soft, calm year, it should not lose its reputation as the toughest test in golf.
Reader Comments (17)
Let's bring rhe US Open back to Merion in 2025 and 'Make the US Open Great Again' and celebrate the 75th Anniversary of Ben Hogan's epic win.
Could not walk the entire course and follow a group
Could not get to tees at 17 or 18
Could not get to 18 green?
No digital scoreboards
Terrible crowd managemrnt where people were trapped behind ropes unable to cross over to see action
Phil lost
The R & A are also going to revisit the venues where Jones won the British Am and The Open. Its a coordinated effort they are planning to accomplish. Bobby Jones and his legacy only slightly more relevant today and forever than Ouimet around the world???!!!
As for the USGA, as I have stated on here countless times, the second they signed the TV deal with Fox they sold their soul and will never regain it. But hey, Fox is really doing a dynamite job helping grow the game with the USGA. While we're young?
If the USGA had their way everybody would go to the museum exhibit (for a few minutes), then go to the merch tent, then to the shipping guys. after that some food area, and if they have no access to a corp tent or table, back to the satellite parking lot.
Not joking.
USGA has given up the concept of watching golf (and therefore having fans close enough to the action to provide a backdrop for tv) in favor of "the experience" as outlined above.
What baffles me is that Chambers and Erin hills were created with input from the USGA--and yet no concern was shown in the designs for the gallery.
If the USGA could get away with no grandstands, and no on-course spectators, they would.
I'm not sure the Wisconsin spectators had a benchmark to work from, so they didn't know what to expect spectator-wise.
I am glad that you had a great spectator experience.
However, I stand by my opinion re the USGA.
I watched a lot of Erin Hills on TV, and from my POV, the broadcast was excellent. A lot of players were shown and the course looked great.
I miss the blimp profusely. The airplane is a little annoying, and only serves as a scene setter; not as a viable tool like the blimp does.